<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Be Careful What You Wish For</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clarkatlarge.com/2009/05/26/be-careful-what-you-wish-for/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clarkatlarge.com/2009/05/26/be-careful-what-you-wish-for/</link>
	<description>Bob Clark’s latest Investment Advisor articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:45:26 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rick Johnson, CASL, CFP, RFC</title>
		<link>http://clarkatlarge.com/2009/05/26/be-careful-what-you-wish-for/comment-page-1/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Johnson, CASL, CFP, RFC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 19:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkatlarge.com/?p=55#comment-165</guid>
		<description>I wrote about this in my book, Keep Your Assets Take My Advice and sent out a press release on this very subject recently. RIA&#039;s are in a tough spot without one clear leadership organization.

FINRA has much more political clout in Washington than the Financial Planning Coalition. It certainly does not help matters that an ex-head of NAPFA is in hot water. I wonder about the timing of that, in addition to the Tower Group white paper. Although I applauded their efforts, the Financial Planning Coalition has a lot of FINRA registered people in it. Are these factors together just a striking co-incidence? Or, could it be the work of behind-the-scenes FINRA lobbyists? I would not be surprised.

My guess is we will see more stories promoting FINRA as the regulator of choice.

Personally, I feel we need a wall between FINRA registered representatives and RIA&#039;s. If FINRA RR&#039;s want to sell product, then let them. However, do not also let them wear two hats and also claim to be fiduciary RIA&#039;s. You cannot have a fiduciary standard of care with sales quotas to maintain your office perks. There is no disputing that fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote about this in my book, Keep Your Assets Take My Advice and sent out a press release on this very subject recently. RIA&#8217;s are in a tough spot without one clear leadership organization.</p>
<p>FINRA has much more political clout in Washington than the Financial Planning Coalition. It certainly does not help matters that an ex-head of NAPFA is in hot water. I wonder about the timing of that, in addition to the Tower Group white paper. Although I applauded their efforts, the Financial Planning Coalition has a lot of FINRA registered people in it. Are these factors together just a striking co-incidence? Or, could it be the work of behind-the-scenes FINRA lobbyists? I would not be surprised.</p>
<p>My guess is we will see more stories promoting FINRA as the regulator of choice.</p>
<p>Personally, I feel we need a wall between FINRA registered representatives and RIA&#8217;s. If FINRA RR&#8217;s want to sell product, then let them. However, do not also let them wear two hats and also claim to be fiduciary RIA&#8217;s. You cannot have a fiduciary standard of care with sales quotas to maintain your office perks. There is no disputing that fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
